tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7641928.post112453943647010722..comments2012-02-17T15:58:43.895-05:00Comments on The Grey Lines: ServiceMix - ServiceMix 1.0 ReleaseMark Griffinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06696309270838259732noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7641928.post-1124719255108979592005-08-22T10:00:00.000-04:002005-08-22T10:00:00.000-04:00I'm intrigued by ServiceMix and think working on a...I'm intrigued by ServiceMix and think working on a WM Broker or BrokerJMS binding would force me to understand what it and JBI really bring to the table. I'm not sure yet what building a ServiceMix binding entails.Mark C.http://blog.conneva.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7641928.post-1124670596821034792005-08-21T20:29:00.000-04:002005-08-21T20:29:00.000-04:00Kind of interesting that they took that approach. ...Kind of interesting that they took that approach. I would have guessed that JMS would be enough given its support by the aforementioned vendors.<BR/><BR/>But hey we got to learn the new Broker 6.5 api sometime, right? What do you have in mind?markghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06696309270838259732noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7641928.post-1124548060707224632005-08-20T10:27:00.000-04:002005-08-20T10:27:00.000-04:00Mark,<br><br>We should whip up a binding for webMe...Mark,<BR/><BR/>We should whip up a binding for webMethods Broker or IS that works with ServiceMix. Can't have a Tibco binding and an MQ Binding without one for WM, now can we?<BR/><BR/>I'm game.Mark C.http://blog.conneva.comnoreply@blogger.com